| Metric | The Bank of Old Monroe | Peer median | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset growth (YoY) | +11.2% | +4.9% | +6.3 pts |
| Deposit growth (YoY) | +9.7% | +4.3% | +5.4 pts |
| Loan growth (YoY) | +20.7% | +5.3% | +15.3 pts |
| ROA | 1.62% | 1.28% | +0.3 pts |
| ROE | 23.4% | 12.5% | +11.0 pts |
ROA ranks in the 70th percentile of its peer group · Q2 2026
| Quarter | Assets | Deposits | Loans | Equity | Net income YTD | ROA | NIM | Nonperforming |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | $994.6M | $916.6M | $657.5M | $70.4M | $8.0M | 1.62% | 3.66% | 0.00% |
| Q1 2026 | $994.6M | $924.2M | $644.3M | $64.2M | $4.3M | 1.77% | 3.70% | 0.05% |
| Q4 2025 | $950.6M | $840.9M | $623.9M | $68.9M | $19.5M | 2.12% | 3.85% | 0.03% |
| Q3 2025 | $953.3M | $859.7M | $596.4M | $60.7M | $14.8M | 2.17% | 3.76% | 0.00% |
| Q2 2025 | $894.5M | $835.5M | $544.8M | $50.5M | $9.9M | 2.20% | 3.70% | 0.00% |
| Q1 2025 | $926.5M | $866.6M | $525.7M | $49.7M | $4.8M | 2.14% | 3.56% | 0.00% |
| Q4 2024 | $879.8M | $815.7M | $531.1M | $49.5M | $17.2M | 2.14% | 3.73% | 0.00% |
| Q3 2024 | $847.8M | $775.3M | $495.0M | $52.8M | $12.8M | 2.17% | 3.71% | 0.00% |
Loan mix (Q2 2026): real estate $557.1M · commercial $94.0M · consumer $2.6M · securities $284.9M
| Ratio | The Bank of Old Monroe | Trend (8q) | Peer median | Peer percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Return on assets Annualized net income ÷ assets | 1.62% | 1.28% | 70th | |
Return on equity Annualized net income ÷ equity or net worth | 23.4% | 12.5% | 95th | |
Net interest margin Interest income − interest expense, ÷ assets | 3.66% | 3.89% |
Peer lists, growth filters, CSV export, CRM push.
Efficiency ratio Operating expense ÷ revenue — lower is leaner | 46.6% | 61.1% | 13th |
Non-interest income share Fees and other income as a share of total revenue | 00.0% | 00.0% |
Cost of funds Annualized interest expense ÷ deposits | 00.0% | 00.0% |
| Ratio | The Bank of Old Monroe | Trend (8q) | Peer median | Peer percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Loan-to-deposit Loans ÷ deposits (shares). Above ~90% needs funding; below ~60% needs loan demand | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
Loans-to-assets How much of the balance sheet is lent out | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
Securities-to-assets Investment portfolio as a share of assets | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
Cash-to-assets On-balance-sheet liquidity | 00.0% | 00.0% |
| Ratio | The Bank of Old Monroe | Trend (8q) | Peer median | Peer percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Uninsured deposit share Deposits above the insurance limit ÷ total deposits. The first number a CFO has watched since 2023; above ~40% is high | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
Brokered deposits Brokered deposits ÷ total deposits — bought funding, rate-sensitive | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
Borrowings-to-assets FHLB advances, fed funds, repos and other borrowings ÷ assets. Rising = deposits aren't keeping up | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
Securities losses ÷ capital Unrealized losses on HTM + AFS securities as a share of tier-1 capital. Above ~30% constrains what they can sell to raise cash | 00.0% | 00.0% |
| Ratio | The Bank of Old Monroe | Trend (8q) | Peer median | Peer percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital ratio Tier 1 capital (banks) or net worth (CUs) ÷ assets. NCUA well-capitalized line: 7% | 00.0% | 00.0% |
| Ratio | The Bank of Old Monroe | Trend (8q) | Peer median | Peer percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonperforming / delinquency Banks: nonperforming assets ÷ assets. CUs: 60+ day delinquent loans ÷ loans | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
Net charge-off rate Annualized charge-offs net of recoveries ÷ loans | 00.0% | 00.0% | ||
CRE concentration Commercial real estate loans ÷ capital. Regulators flag banks above 300% | 00.0% | 00.0% |
| Ratio | The Bank of Old Monroe | Trend (8q) | Peer median | Peer percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets per office Branch efficiency; high numbers usually mean digital-first | 00.0% | 00.0% |
The full ratio pack is part of CharterBench Pro.
5 branches in 2 counties across 1 state (+0 vs 2025) · $916.6M branch deposits. Biggest market: Lincoln, MO, ranked 1st with 40.3% of deposits.
| County | Branches | Deposits | Share | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln, MO | 3 | $699.5M | 40.29% | 1st |
| St. Charles, MO | 2 | $217.1M | 1.78% | 14th |
Missouri: 52nd with 0.31% · St. Louis metro: 30th, 0.58% ·
Branch count: 2022 5 · 2023 5 · 2024 5 · 2025 5 · 2026 5
Technology spend up 41% in 2025. Pro shows the figures, trend and peer comparison.
Technology spend is part of CharterBench Pro — on every bank page, in the screener and in the account brief.
Banks itemize data processing on Schedule RI-E when it exceeds $100,000 and 7% of other non-interest expense; most community banks itemize at year-end only, so figures are full calendar years. Peer group: banks in the same asset band. Not available for credit unions (the NCUA call report has no comparable line).
Ranked #719 of 1,445 lenders in FY2020 — an active SBA 7(a) lender.
Year-by-year volume and rank, loan size and pricing, top states and industries, and charge-offs by vintage are part of CharterBench Pro.
7(a) approvals net of cancellations, attributed to the lender named in the SBA’s file. 504 loans are made through certified development companies and are not included. All SBA lenders →
Ranked #1,659 of 4,653 mortgage lenders in 2025.
Approval rates, pricing, purchase vs. refinance, HELOCs, government lending, how much it sells vs. keeps, top states and the year-by-year trend are part of CharterBench Pro.
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data (CFPB). Includes mortgage subsidiaries that the Philadelphia Fed’s HMDA Lender File ties to this institution. Small lenders below the HMDA reporting thresholds do not file. All mortgage lenders →